The City of Richmond Truth Tazer

Truth so plain and simple that it's SHOCKING! Yes, it hurts some more than others, so proceed with caution!

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

ONE STEPS UP!

A sunny Wednesday to the Tazer Faithful! We offer up a new look for something new!

First, an editorial from today's Times...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Firearms and schools

ON MONDAY, the first day of classes at Nystrom Elementary in Richmond, bullets suddenly whizzed through the school at lunchtime.

Two rounds shot through a classroom where four students were taking a test. One pierced through a wall and traveled back outside to a playground crammed with students at recess.

Miraculously, none of the schoolchildren or staff were injured. But needless to say, the experience was a traumatic one for everyone involved.

Police say three men in a Champagne-colored Cadillac were chasing another car near the school and shot after it. Instead of hitting their target, the bullets wound up endangering innocent bystanders.

Street shoot-outs happen with alarming regularity in Richmond. Police, city officials and community leaders have been grappling for solutions to the frightening violence.

According the West Contra Unified School District, this is the first time that shots have been fired into a school. It takes the city's violence to a new level. We understand the community's outrage at the unidentified gunmen's blatant disregard for the children inside the school.

But Richmond residents must do more than vent. Someone, somewhere, knows who fired the bullets that easily could have killed an innocent child.

Whoever knows the identity of the shooters must come forward and tell authorities so that the menaces responsible can be arrested. Police are offering a $10,000 reward. We applaud the staff at Nystrom for their handling of the incident.

Principal Wendy Holmes, in her first day on the job, used a megaphone to call all the children inside and got them to safety. After the gunshots, teachers ordered those students already inside to hit the ground.

Quick thinking all around prevented pandemonium, which could have caused people to get hurt. School officials appear to have done everything right. Now, it's time for residents to come forward and do the right thing.

Richmond, as a community, must send a message that it will not tolerate thugs firing guns in the vicinity of a school.

California's Health and Safety Code enhances the criminal penalties for people convicted of selling drugs within 1,000 feet of schools.

The reason is obvious. The activity associated with drug sales places children at risk, be it of using drugs themselves or of falling victim to drug-related violence.

The code should be amended so that the same enhancements apply to anyone who brandishes a firearm near a school.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Tazer also congratulates the school staff for their quick thinking, and are glad to point out the silver lining in no casualties. We hope that RPD's efforts and the reward will result in the rapid capture of the involved parties.

Next up, another reaction to the incident, and it's something we at the Tazer have been waiting to hear: a candidate for Mayor of Richmond has actually spoken out...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 29, 2006

"Richmond Mayoral candidate Gary Bell offers proposal to curb violence."

I am saddened and outraged by the shooting incident at Nystrom Elementary School yesterday. I denounce this crime, and pledge that as an individual citizen and candidate for Mayor, that I will be committed to lending every available resource to confront this ongoing issue.

In the days since the Mayor's press conference regarding a special election, there has been silence regarding crime. Absent any comments, the public deserves to know the stance of city officials, but lacking those, they should know the stance of candidates for city offices.

I believe that the time has come for Richmond to consider the idea of a Constitutional, citywide "Gun Free" zone. I am prepared to discuss this and further proposals surrounding this unfortunate incident in an effort to help make our city a safer one.

For more information, visit my website, "GaryBell.org".

The media is welcome to contact me regarding this issue at (510) 612-1835, or by e-mail at "gb926@aol.com". I will be happy to provide further comment and answer any questions that you may have.

Yours in service,
Gary L. Bell

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Tazer thanks Mr. Bell for that statement, as it certainly gets the ball rolling on discussion. We extend a similar invitation to any and all candidates to speak out about this incident, as well as other policies and thoughts on violent crime. We promise to publish statements of similar form and size, but reserve the right to edit for length.

Our invitation for all to comment freely on the Tazer likewise stands and so long as common sense and sensibilities aren't abused we actually encourage it. Solutions are out there to be found, so bring them here!

14 Comments:

  • At August 30, 2006 12:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Are we finally going to talk about guns now, after gunfire sprayed an elementary school with children present?

    What about the hundreds who have lost their lives to gunfire in Richmond over the past decade?

    If Richmond doesn't set aside more monies for police enforcement to do the policing of policies already on the books like "Drug Free" zones, how will Richmond enforce "Gun Free" zones?

    Political chit-chat has never been a surprise here at election time!

     
  • At August 30, 2006 1:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    As Peace advocate Mike Ali has stated here in the Tazer before, it about teaching the values of peace.

     
  • At August 30, 2006 1:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    As Peace advocate Mike Ali has stated here in the Tazer before, it about teaching the values of peace.

     
  • At August 30, 2006 2:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Wow, did I think Nat Bates was running again when I received today's mail with my copy of the Richmond Police Officers Assocation glossy document which seemingly supports candidate Bell while bashing Mayor Anderson.

    Can anyone respect such a poorly prepared document? Listing the same paraphrase three times?

    Such a low hit piece as this is just a hint of what we will all be in for after election time is long gone.

    This is political thuggery.

     
  • At August 30, 2006 2:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    In response to "whatever" free zones, there are already laws on the books regarding what constitutes a crime, including near schools. Just because it happened near a school, a church, a burrito truck, or your house shouldn't make a difference; crimes shouldn't be tolerated. Likewise, it shouldn't matter if the thugs were in a Cadillac or on Schwinns, or if they were shooting guns or swinging bats; criminals should be punished. I personally think that Gary Bell is wasting his time if he doesn't just go ahead and say that aggressive pursuit of criminals is more important than writing some new law for people to ignore, especially where firearms are concerned. Triggers have no heart, which is why you lock up crooks.

    In response to the RPOA mailer, I think I'll take a stab at calling out "disgusted" as a socko. For all that Irma's "done" in regards to public safety I'd quite frankly be surprised if they reacted differently. And if they did, I get the impression that you'd be crowing about how much the RPOA loved Irma instead. Would that be "political thuggery" in favor of Anderson in your eyes? Come now, be honest...

    To conclude, I appreciate the step that Bell has taken in speaking out and starting the discussion. Though I disagree with cluttering up the books with laws, I otherwise agree with his sentiment about the Nystrom incident. I'd like to read what other candidates feel about it, what they have to say, and what real and concrete solutions they would take if they were elected.

    Now's as good a time as any. Tazer's as good a place as any. Hop to it, candidates!

     
  • At August 30, 2006 3:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I just loved the political flyer against Irma today! It said it all!
    lololololololololololololololololol

     
  • At August 30, 2006 4:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    One can check back in the Tazer Archives, week 8 06 06, you will find the Times 8 09 06 COMMENTARY reproduced by the RPOA there.

    My point is that ANYONE* could have written that piece & it is not necessarily the opinion of the Times, they just printed it as media commentary.

    *Consider that SOMEONE might have planned and facilitated the whole hit-piece.

     
  • At August 30, 2006 5:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Though not necessarily the opinion of the Times NEWSPAPER, it must be an opinion of the Times EDITOR(S), otherwise it wouldn't feature where it did without a name to go with it. It certainly paints a picture of Irma Anderson a particular way but it includes plenty of facts. I'm honestly rather jealous that I didn't think to write it myself.

    So, "disgusted" sockpuppet, why don't you and/or Irma Anderson share with the class what bones you have to pick with 1) that editorial, 2) Kevin Martin and the RPOA's use of it, and 3) the Richmond First Committee's sponsorship of the mailing? If you/Irma think that it's really a "hit piece" made from whole cloth, then you/Irma should be able to knock it right down.

    Heck, I'll even help you along. From the front cover of the mailer, start by discussing your/Irma's feelings regarding that statement...

    "And of course, there is the crime issue...Street Killings are out of control. In the shadow of these, Anderson, who is running for re-election in November, is casting about for a campaign issue. She wants to portray herself to voters as a strong leader willing to take the bull by the horns...however, the Anderson we have come to know is a disappointingly ineffective, divisive gavel-banger."

     
  • At August 30, 2006 5:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Looks like old socko got taken to school! LOL!!

     
  • At August 30, 2006 6:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Oh what the hell, who cares?

    'It's Summertime, Pass the Ball"

     
  • At August 30, 2006 7:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    These are some of the most lame agruements in the defense of Anderson. Where are her BAPAC losers at in all of this? I will tell you, they like the rats they are have abandoned the U.S.S. Irma!
    Abandon ship boys, We've been hit!

     
  • At August 30, 2006 9:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    BAPAC what a laugh another old geezer group out of touch with the tomes and community! Just like Irma!

     
  • At August 31, 2006 2:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I have been following the Tazer since May of this year. I really have been learning a great deal from the community as to what is really going on.

    The Richmond Greens have only one focus politically. Whereas the Tazer gives many politically realities here in Richmond. I think the Greens here in town are not focused enough on what is really happening here in Richmond!

    I believe I will be voting for someone else for Mayor

     
  • At September 01, 2006 12:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    green campaign littering = hypocrisy

    SO WHAT ELSE IS NEW?!

     

Post a Comment

<< Home