The City of Richmond Truth Tazer

Truth so plain and simple that it's SHOCKING! Yes, it hurts some more than others, so proceed with caution!

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Tom Butt: "Anybody but Anderson"

Tazer Faithful, we declare ourselves vindicated. Those of you who happen to agree with us should feel the same.

From Tom Butt's e-mail forum to you, here is his anti-endorsement in all its electronic glory...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tonight I am officially joining the "anybody but Anderson" (for mayor) movement.  She has finally pushed me over the edge.

I spent half a day over the weekend preparing a PowerPoint presentation I intended to present under Item K-4, placed on the agenda by Councilmember Jim Rogers. The item was entitled "Review and discuss convening a 'Blue Ribbon Task Force' of stakeholders, consisting of environmental, business and community interest, to make recommendations concerning the shoreline area between the Chevron refinery and the West County landfill project and provide direction to staff. Pending completion of this report city staff would not take any action concerning this area and would not proceed with the feasibility study."

Mayor Anderson used every lame excuse she could think of to keep me from speaking and showing the PowerPoint. After I protested vigorously, she appeared to relent, but before I could begin, she started in on me again -- one time too many.

The irony is that Irma Anderson is generally a pleasant and amiable person, one on one. You couldn't find a better person to carry out the ceremonial functions of the city. Politically, over the years, we have had few differences. On paper, she looks like just what we need in a mayor.

But when she takes that mayor's seat, she turns into an unbelievable tyrant. She constantly interrupts councilmembers and starts arguments with them. She uses her power to bully them. She feels compelled to respond to every single statement they make and routinely calls them out of order. Most of the time, she either doesn't understand what is going on or does a pretty good job of faking it. She doesn't have a clue how to successfully chair a meeting. In short, she just generally makes life miserable for us and for the public. She is the absolute worst chair of an organization I have ever worked with. Over the years, she has been extremely vindictive, using whatever meager appointment powers she has to punish councilmembers who oppose her.

I blame her chairmanship style for unnecessarily prolonging every meeting by at least 20 percent. She has probably added a thousand hours to city Council meetings. With a dozen high paid staff sitting around during that wasted time, she has probably cost the city a million dollars. Most of what the public perceives as failure of the City Council to work together as a team can be laid at the mayor's fundamental inability to simply conduct a meeting.

When she ran for mayor, she touted her ability to "bring the council together." What any councilmember will tell you privately is that she did exactly that. She united the Council as never before in that they all despise her management style.

Almost as bad are those councilmembers who let her get away with it. Like a flock of chickens, they would rather keep down a colleague than stand up to that miserable excuse for a mayor. After I walked out and went home to cool off, I watched Councilmember Maria Viramontes put words in my mouth that I have never spoken and explain why she wanted more information about the proposed container port. Apparently, she didn't want it from me, because she didn't want to see my presentation either.

A City Council should be about the sharing of information that is important for Richmond and for the public. For the City Council majority to use their power and their bullying tactics to keep important information away from the public is, in my opinion, a subversion of the public interest.

We have an election coming up in about six weeks. At this time, I urge you to vote for anybody but Anderson for mayor. And when you consider the other City Council and mayoral candidates, ask yourself if they are closed minded or open minded? Do they support open public debate, or do they use every stratagem to shut down those who have an opposing view. Do they respect people, or do they treat them like dogs?

In six weeks, you will get the mayor and City Council you deserve. I hope you do the right thing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well said, Councilman Butt! We also hope that Richmond voters will do the right thing.

16 Comments:

  • At September 20, 2006 9:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    While I am not thrilled that Tom Butt is supporting Gayle McLaughlin for mayor, he is right about Anderson. She and Gayle are both UNFIT TO SERVE!
    But Anderson should simply KNOW better, she has stooped to political repression as a campaign tool. That would include censorship! The world saw what happened on KCRT Tuesday at Council, Anderson was out of control! Vote no on Nov.7th!

     
  • At September 20, 2006 9:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Hey Tommy boy, you meant to say
    ABAAM! You know if you are going to be political correct, you meant to say ABAAM...."Anybody But Anderson And McLaughlin!" Tom one last thing, you really have poor taste in your political wives!

     
  • At September 20, 2006 9:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I'd say this crosses one off my list, but Irma was already pretty much written off. Richmond needs change. So, the choices are down to Bell and McLaughlin.

    Sorry, but McLaughlin can't be serious. Looking at her website and other campaign material, she's painfully, woefully out of her depth. Lots of nebulous, fuzzy ideas that might sound great on paper to her political base, but reading between the lines makes it sound like she and her "progressives" (no emphasis on progress) want to stick it to business of all shapes and sizes, but primarily large. Makes me think of Bobby Boucher's mama...

    "Chevron da devil! I invented good government!"

    Otherwise, can someone tell me I'm wrong to vote for Gary Bell?

     
  • At September 20, 2006 10:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Butt got caught trying to play politics his way again. This wasn't the first time he's walked out of a council meeting in a huff.

    Since Rogers put the item on the agenda, it should have been Rogers making the presentation. Butt has been the most involved and outspoken council person addressing the container port issue. So, why didn't he put the item on the agenda?

    Shouldn't they all know the rules?

     
  • At September 20, 2006 10:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    >> Since Rogers put the item on the agenda, it should have been Rogers making the presentation.
    >> Butt has been the most involved and outspoken council person addressing the container port
    >> issue. So, why didn't he put the item on the agenda?
    >.
    >> Shouldn't they all know the rules?

    Is there a procedure? I'm certain there is, and I'd recommend that it was followed. However, does Madam Mayor insist on using such trickery as a bludgeon against something or someone she doesn't want to hear about?

    THAT is the height of childish petulance, and she should be ashamed! "Nyah nyah nyah, NOT LISTENING TO YOU!"

    Shouldn't she want to hear what everyone has to say?

     
  • At September 20, 2006 10:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Weren't they going over a document for proper procedures just prior to this incident! Anderson can't even get them out of their own way!

    How would you like to be one of the paid staff having to deal with those folks? I feel for them!

     
  • At September 20, 2006 11:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    It's political season, and all of the political whores will now be available to sell to the highest bidder. It was with great relief that Butt finally had a chance to 'experience' the wrath of Irma.
    To me it would seem she has mental health issues and should not seek reelection. What do you think Tom?

     
  • At September 20, 2006 3:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    That anonymous sock puppet is trying to say that it was OK for Irma to shut people up she disagrees with? Her murder machine even kills free speech now!

     
  • At September 20, 2006 4:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At September 20, 2006 4:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At September 20, 2006 8:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    As usual Dread Cap is right. Gary Bell is the only canddate worth a damn to be mayor.

     
  • At September 21, 2006 10:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Anderson resign today! Get out the community's way!

     
  • At September 21, 2006 12:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I just got a chance to see the meeting via streaming video on KCRT.com. If anyone's interested, the exchange starts brewing around 1:40 in. Butt wasn't kidding.

    What happened in that chamber was BULL****! I think my only objection to his account was that he didn't let "Meat Loaf" Viramontes have it hard enough! She was just about as bad as Anderson about nickel-n-diming the process into oblivion.

    I'm calling the both of them out as THEE prime example of what is absolutely wrong with Richmond! When a city council is more interested in discussing why there shouldn't be discussion, it's time for people like them to GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY!

     
  • At September 21, 2006 3:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At September 21, 2006 3:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At September 21, 2006 5:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home