A Great Question To Start The Week...
As we start a new week, Tazer friend Inge Oliver brings up a great question:
Well, I read the Tazer............ and I'm wondering, why wouldn't the Tazer go right to the source, Mr. Corky Booze to verify this part of my statement regarding the incident last Tuesday in the parking lot of the temporary City Hall, before making the questionable remarks?
Irma Anderson cannot testify to said incident, she was not involved, it was her son.
Everybody, who watched the CC-meeting could see Mr. Anderson approaching Mr. Booze in the chambers during the meeting, and short there after, Mr. Booze left the chambers.
As I see it, that is one piece of evidence, and Mr. Booze can give you the rest of the story.
I certainly agree with you, the language some people use, is less than unprofessional and very offensive, and the Tazer really should think twice before something like that should be published.
Thought, I have to share that with you.
Sincerely,
Inge Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAZER NOTE: Thank you Inge. Mr. Booze has a standing invitation to offer commentary of any kind with the Tazer, and has had it for quite some time. We've requested this information through the same sources that brought us the story of Mr. Anderson allegedly doing something to Mr. Booze in the parking lot and, as of yet, have not received a response from Mr. Booze.
As soon as the Tazer receives a response or commentary from Mr. Booze, we will post it.
The Tazer offered Mr. Anderson an opportunity to explain this incident, as some pretty nasty commentary was being thrown around in regard to what happened. That offer still stands as well.
Well, I read the Tazer............ and I'm wondering, why wouldn't the Tazer go right to the source, Mr. Corky Booze to verify this part of my statement regarding the incident last Tuesday in the parking lot of the temporary City Hall, before making the questionable remarks?
Irma Anderson cannot testify to said incident, she was not involved, it was her son.
Everybody, who watched the CC-meeting could see Mr. Anderson approaching Mr. Booze in the chambers during the meeting, and short there after, Mr. Booze left the chambers.
As I see it, that is one piece of evidence, and Mr. Booze can give you the rest of the story.
I certainly agree with you, the language some people use, is less than unprofessional and very offensive, and the Tazer really should think twice before something like that should be published.
Thought, I have to share that with you.
Sincerely,
Inge Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAZER NOTE: Thank you Inge. Mr. Booze has a standing invitation to offer commentary of any kind with the Tazer, and has had it for quite some time. We've requested this information through the same sources that brought us the story of Mr. Anderson allegedly doing something to Mr. Booze in the parking lot and, as of yet, have not received a response from Mr. Booze.
As soon as the Tazer receives a response or commentary from Mr. Booze, we will post it.
The Tazer offered Mr. Anderson an opportunity to explain this incident, as some pretty nasty commentary was being thrown around in regard to what happened. That offer still stands as well.
posted by Plunda Claus @ 6:45 AM
4 Comments:
At June 12, 2006 6:04 PM,
Anonymous said…
I've read references to an "incident" between Anderson and Booze, but with little elaboration.
Maybe the lack of information is from intimidation. Maybe it's that involved parties want to forget or otherwise put it behind them. But even all that is speculation in and of itself.
Truth is where you find it. Or not.
At June 12, 2006 6:58 PM,
Anonymous said…
I think the first thing I think of the Richmond Truth Tazer, is being a WATCHDOG for our Community and a timely and important news source that again the whole Community can participate in!
The City Government of Richmond is POLITICALLY REPRESSIVE and most controlling of all commentary including THE OPEN FORUM during the City Council meetings!
The RACIST WEST COUNTY TIMES is as well POLITICALLY REPRESSIVE! They have an informal blacklisting of people or individuals that they will not quote or give fair or equal access to explain their positions regarding the real Richmond Violence Movement or the Boycott!
It is like we are turning from a Community of democracy into a specter of Nationalist Socialism. These are highly unstable, deadly and dangerous times in the City of Richmond! The City Government of Richmond, the Mayor's office and certain members of the City Council are fanning the flames of politically repression everywhere!
In Indian Country we Native People see the reality daily of the different forms of political repression. I have always seen the City of Richmond as nothing more than urban reservation; and the Mayor's Office as nothing more than a domestic form of the Bureau of Indian Affairs(BIA).
Soon the citizens of this city will see that their First Amendment Rights, Civil and Human Rights will be totally meaningless!
"Yours In the Struggle for Human and Civil Rights in the City of Richmond!"
Micheal Ali,
The Committee of Families For the
Safety of Our Chidren
At June 13, 2006 2:45 AM,
Anonymous said…
I think Corky is so deep and he is so good!
At June 13, 2006 5:04 AM,
Anonymous said…
Why in the hell does'nt Booze speak up for himself in this matter, the big cry-baby! Boo-hoo!
Run behind the skirts of the women, they will protect you from those big bad bully boys!
Post a Comment
<< Home