The City of Richmond Truth Tazer

Truth so plain and simple that it's SHOCKING! Yes, it hurts some more than others, so proceed with caution!

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Violent Crime & Funding Roulette

Folks in the City of Richmond's budget machine must be going nuts...

"We have to build a new Civic Center to make the city look updated and attractive to business...but that means we can't fix the potholes. And fixing potholes shows that the city cares about upkeep and smooth transportation for people and business. But we can't borrow any more money, especially if there's some kind of crisis...wait a minute. Violent crime IS a crisis! So, about funding stuff like public safety and this youth corps thingy..."

---------------------------------

Mayor asks for residents' help
RICHMOND: McLaughlin says everyone must work together to stop violence, solve city's other pressing problems


By John Geluardi
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

Newly sworn in as Richmond's mayor, Gayle McLaughlin asked residents this week to make a greater commitment to solving the city's most critical problem: chronic violence.

"It is clear our single-most important issue in Richmond is our crime," she told the 300-plus people packed into the council chamber Tuesday night to see her take the oath of office. Another 200 people watched the ceremony on closed-circuit televisions in a large tent set up in the City Hall parking lot.

"While we strengthen law enforcement, giving it what it needs to enforce the law, we must not deceive ourselves; We must be realistic in our understanding that law enforcement alone will never eradicate violence," she said.

After taking the oath, McLaughlin called for a moment of silence for shooting victim Victor Ramirez, a 25-year-old immigrant who was shot in the head last week in an apparent act of random violence. He remains on life support at John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek.

There were 42 homicides in Richmond last year, seven more than in 2004, when Morgan Quitno Press named Richmond the most violent city in California and the 11th most violent in the country.

The violence, which was the central focus of last year's mayoral campaign, has its roots in systemic problems of poverty, unemployment and a lack of education opportunities, McLaughlin said.

"Our challenge in Richmond is to become a role model for solving these systemic problems," she said. "But in order to do this, an investment is required at a level greater than which currently exists. It will take a more cooperative City Council, increased revenue and a further commitment of free time from us all to begin to turn around our endemic violence."

Addressing the city's need to grow the economy, she described Richmond as a city of "great untapped potential" and called on residents and businesses to be more innovative in creating smart-growth policies and responsible environmental programs.

"We will flourish and become a healthy and sustainable city only if we believe in ourselves," she said. "The future of Richmond demands a robust local economy, one that keeps money circulating in our city."

McLaughlin takes over as mayor in a city that faces serious challenges. Richmond is still recovering from a devastating, $35 million budget crisis in 2004. Under the guidance of Finance Director Jim Goins, the city has been able to build up reserve funds of about $10 million.

But the Chevron refinery has cut its annual utility tax payment by an estimated $4 million a year, a reduction that has jeopardized the budget's fragile recovery.

Playing a kind of financial brinkmanship, Richmond broke ground last week on the $110 million Civic Center renovation, the largest public works project in the city's history. To fund the project, Richmond has exhausted its bond capacity, which means the city cannot borrow more money in case of a new financial or infrastructure crisis.

The hidden cost of the renovation can be found in the city's potholes. Richmond's roads are in the worst condition of any city in the Bay Area, and taxpayers are sitting on a road repair bill of $94 million. Unless the city finds funding for repairs soon, the cost will skyrocket to $200 million in 2010, about the time McLaughlin's first term is up.

In keeping with the nonpartisan election, McLaughlin, a Green Party member, put an emphasis on shared principles and values. She promised to work collaboratively with her eight council colleagues.

She also promised to be more than a ceremonial mayor.

"I will be a problem solver and not a ribbon cutter," she said to a loud applause from those watching the ceremony in the tent. "Over the next four years, it will be our turn to show results."

Reach John Geluardi at 510-262-2787 or at jgeluardi@cctimes.com.

9 Comments:

  • At January 11, 2007 2:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    She meant to say she will be more a of cermonial jerk.

     
  • At January 11, 2007 4:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The Tazer collective is kicking a** these days. It's about time somebody had the guts to put these slobs like McLaughlin, Geluardi and Anderson in check. This seems like the only place where people can express themselves and least get a chance to be heard.

     
  • At January 12, 2007 9:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I wanted to believe that the Green party was different. But I can’t.

    As a life long Richmond resident, which incidentally few people in bother to ask about the "green victory" I can tell you that this race was not about a green victory. It was about divided constituencies, crime, race, money and gender.

    I am Black and I voted for Ralph Nader in the presidential election a few years ago. My affection for the party ended shortly after when I realized its white liberal elitism was no different than the democrats.

    Given that we live in a time when America has to ask the question "Are we ready for a Black president?" (As if the last four years of Bush's brilliantly willful autocratic obstructionism didn't carry water) you have to ask yourself is there a viable party choice in our democracy? Do we just call our democracy for democracy’s sake when the majority of voters never participate in the process? Worse yet, locally and nationally it appears that when historically disenfranchised voters do appear to vote there are “problems” swept away by blue ribbon commissions and Supreme Court rulings.

    Where were the Greens on the issue of Richmond poll troubles last November? Where was the advocacy for “transparency in government” then when the most basic of democratic principles was in question? The silence is deafening.

    The African-American electorate is unfortunately forced in making three instead of two unappealing choices. We can either choose Republicans who doggedly believe in personal responsibility except when it comes to white elites, Democrats who espouse the ideas of white elites but fail to rebut them in policy or practicality, or the "others" like the Greens who play at being sympathetic, but offer no real opportunities except to insult your intelligence.

    I was forced early in my political education to make a choice. Stand with a party that I know has representation and policy issues from the get go, or one that worse, refuses to acknowledge that it has any.

    That said, the new mayor, like all mayors should have an opportunity to show what she has to offer. And she is right. Renewing Richmond will always be a team effort. However, the Richmond Greens need to be aware of the bad taste left in some folks mouths will not be quenched by pandering or superficial photo opportunities. Real change means that you don't fight FOR the people you work WITH them. And hopefully some of the people you claim to be fighting for have a mind of their own and a space at the table.

    If the Greens really want to make a difference in communities of color, they should rethink the condescending rhetoric that debases them to "We want to save your poor little community," and start inviting real debate, even on green principles and authentic Black leadership that isn't about parroting some lofty ideal and is about problem solving.

    Then, maybe, we could have a real debate. Until then, the party will remain a West Wing spin off to the Friday night main event.

    And I hate to think thank after the presidential debacle of 2000, and all those people whose votes were never counted in Florida that the Greens will be reduced on race to what they claim to abhor; the lesser of three evils.

     
  • At January 12, 2007 3:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I think that people like Gayle and John are truly yesterday's news! Thanks Tazer for putting it out there. And keep on trucking for the community.

     
  • At January 12, 2007 4:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    God, why does the city of Richmond always keep accepting these outsiders that are nothing more than troublemakers?

     
  • At January 13, 2007 5:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    McLaughlin in power! It' bad dream that has become a reality!

     
  • At January 13, 2007 6:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    To Sunshine Jones,

    Dear Ms. Jones: I want to thank you for one for the most brillant political essays of the Richmond landscape since the post-election.
    I believe that is how many of us in this town feel. As a Native American activist, I too believe my of your candid and truthful thoughts that you have shared with us here in your posting.
    Thank you again, look forward to seeing more of your postings in the future.

    Mike Ali

     
  • At January 15, 2007 3:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Sounds like somebody green didn't get their nap.

     
  • At January 16, 2007 5:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Thanks Mike. I just had to get that out.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home