The City of Richmond Truth Tazer

Truth so plain and simple that it's SHOCKING! Yes, it hurts some more than others, so proceed with caution!

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Enough is enough!

Disturbing news, Tazer Faithful. Please read this carefully.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Police say movie attack is hate crime
RICHMOND: At least three people were seriously assaulted by a group of black men at the Century 16 Theater


By Karl Fischer
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

Richmond police determined Friday that at least three people attacked by a crowd of young black men at Century 16 Hilltop theater this month were victims of hate crimes.

Two victims were attacked Aug. 11 outside the theater, and one was assaulted inside, stomped by at least 30 men while the film "Step Up" continued to roll, Police Chief Chris Magnus said.

The theater staff failed to help any of the victims. In one case, a witness reported employees in the theater lobby laughing as they watched a crowd of about 10 men beat and kick a woman huddled on the sidewalk in front of the building.

If identified, some of the attackers could face felony assault charges, Magnus said.

"We're really getting a horrific picture of what happened up there that night," Magnus said. "We are now saying that some of the factors present indicate there was a potential hate crime."

But police have been unable to identify suspects, or even the victim huddled on the sidewalk, in part because of a failure on the part of patrol officers to do their jobs properly on the night of the incident, Magnus said. Officers failed to take one victim's report until his mother phoned later to complain. They routed another victim's report as "vandalism."

In the "vandalism" case, Magnus confirmed, a crowd of young black men in front of the theater smashed the window of the victim's car and tried to drag her out by her ponytail, while someone shouted, "Get the white bitch!"

Representatives from San Rafael-based Century Theatres did not return several phone messages.

The incident began about an hour into the movie, police said, during a scene dealing with interracial dating. A crowd of young black men seated in the back rows began shouting and throwing candy toward the front of the theater, mainly occupied by Latinos and Filipinos.

Philip Herrera, 23, stood up and asked them to stop pelting his girlfriend and mother. In response, several men hauled him out of his seat and beat him severely enough to cause a concussion, according to the victim and witnesses. Dozens of others joined in kicking him as he crawled up the aisle.

Although Herrera said he did not believe his beating was racially motivated, his mother thought it was. So did City Councilman John Marquez, who also suggested that ethnic animus on the part of the officers, who are black, influenced their response.

Herrera and his mother, Judy Martinez, told the Times last week that officers refused to enter the theater to look for suspects, refused to take a written report, refused to escort Martinez into the theater to look for her shoes and refused to escort the group to their car.

"This has been going on for years," said Aleta Martinez, Herrera's aunt. "I was born and raised in Richmond, and I've lived with harassment and racial discrimination my entire life. It's gotten worse and worse there."

Marquez said this week that he supported the department's follow-up actions, including the internal affairs investigation launched by Magnus into officer conduct during the attacks.

"The chief sent me an e-mail with all the steps that have been taken so far, and it sounds like everything he is doing is right on," Marquez said. "But there is still the police internal investigation into the officers' response, and I am waiting to see how that comes out."

Mayor Irma Anderson, who is black, skirted the race issue.

"Violence against anyone is totally unacceptable regardless of who the perpetrator is and who the victim is," she said. "It saddens me that there still exists challenges to building trust between the Police Department and the local community."

The victim who attackers tried to pull from her car, Rene, told the Times she drove to the theater in her pajamas about 11:30 p.m. to pick up her son, who attended the 9:55 p.m. showing. She said that when she arrived, she saw a large crowd in front of the theater, and several people beating the unidentified victim huddled there.

Rene asked the Times not to publish her full name because she is afraid.

She said she apparently drove too close to the beating, because the crowd turned on her car. Several of the men jumped on her car, kicking and pounding. They smashed her rear windshield and stole her purse.

When police arrived, the men were trying to drag Rene out of her car by her hair.

"(Police) told me to get the hell out of there," she said, "because it wasn't safe."

Rene has spent the past two weeks trying to file a damage claim with the theater to get the $5,000 worth of damage to her car repaired. The Police Department had better luck arranging a meeting with Century Theatre management this week.

"We went over some of our concerns and offered some ideas for avoiding problems," such as turning off movies at the first sign of a riot and keeping more than one security guard on duty after 11 p.m., Magnus said.

"They need to step up and be much more proactive. I don't even think it's adequate to say they'll keep more security on duty later in the evening," Magnus said. "I think it's a question of whether they have the training, support and equipment to deal with some of the crowds going in there."

Staff writer John Geluardi contributed to this article. Reach Karl Fischer at 510-262-2728 or kfischer@cctimes.com.

HOW TO HELP

Police ask anyone victimized in the Aug. 11 assaults at the Century 16 Hilltop theater, or who has information about them, to call Detective Sgt. Lee Hendrickson at 510-620-6616.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TAZER SAYS: We're about to throw a couple haymakers now...

1) The perpetrators need to be identified, apprehended, and prosecuted. The value of calling the incidents "hate crimes" worries us less than that these were crimes of particular viciousness. Crooks need to be off the streets and examples must be made.

2) For that to happen, there needs to be massive cooperation between police, victims, witnesses, and the theater. Fear from victims and witnesses is natural, but unprofessional buffoonery from police and theater employees shouldn't be tolerated. If the allegations of negligence and dereliction are true, punishment should follow.

3) The theater personnel were probably outnumbered, but that shouldn't be an excuse for laughing it up at a violent crime in progress, let alone not picking up the phone and calling 911. About the only thing worse might be the misconduct of police officers who are supposed to be trained for just such a situation. However, we hope the charges are untrue and that people in a position to remedy those incidents acted properly. To us, that's just simple HUMANITY!

4) That said, we invite Chief Magnus to maintain all possible transparency for this case and keep the public informed. We appreciate his candor so far and hope it continues, no matter the results. On its face, this dilemma might seem harmful to RPD's image, but we suggest that undue secrecy would only make it worse. People need to have faith that the system works.

5) Council member Marquez: Keeping it fair and down the middle with a "wait and see" approach, and showing great responsiveness to a citizen's concern. You get a gold star from the Tazer!

6) Mayor Anderson: Absolutely right when she says that violence is unacceptable, regardless of race. However, we don't see any words of support for Chief Magnus. Another missed opportunity to demonstrate leadership by praising her relationship with her police chief, and just lamentations that she doesn't like the state of affairs between RPD and the community. Tsk tsk, no gold star for you.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Umm...OK, WHY?

We now post an amusing ramble from the comments on the candidate's forum topic. Gird your eyes and look upon true madness! Or annoyance...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anonymous said...
THE SO-CALLED "TRUTH" TAZER & IT'S BAND OF FLUNKIES SAY "ACTIVIST" LIKE A SMEAR ON GAYLE MCLAUGHLIN. WHAT ARE ANDERSON OR BELL FOR. THATS RIGHT THERE FOR THEMSELFS. GAYLE REALLY CARES ABOUT YOUR COMMUNITY BUT BIG BUSINESS LIKE CHEVRON EXPLOIT YOU WITH POLLUTION AND GREED AND DON'T PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAX SO YOU TURN A BLIND EYE BECAUSE YOU PART OF THE CORPORATE PROBLEM. I BET YOU HAVE'NT READ GAYLE'S 10-PT PLAN FOR RICHMOND OR YOU WOULD KNOW SHE IS ONLY CANDIATE CAPABLE OF MAKING YOUR CITY A BETTER PLACE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN. WHAT SHE REALLY WANTS IS REAL JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT JUST FOR FEW. GAYLE'S PLAN IS TO BRING BACK WHAT IRMA ANDERSON TOOK AWAY WITH GREED AND ARROGANCE. GAYLE WILL BE A MAYOR WITH HONESTY AND INTEGRITTY WHO WORKS FOR YOU TO MAKE A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT WITHOUT OIL OR POLLUTION AND MAKES PROGRAMS TO SOLVE YOUR PROBLEMS WITH CRIME, DRUGS AND VIOLENCE. IF YOU PEOPLE WERE MORE OPENMINDED YOU WOULD SEE THAT GAYLE MCLAUGHLIN SHOULD BE MAYOR!

12:14 PM


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for your comment! Now it's our turn...

For starters, get that caplocks key looked at. We don't like to read entire screeds that LOOK LIKE THIS!

And for the last time the Tazer is about TRUTH. Not so-called, or sort-of, or what-have-you. The truth is that you need to fix that caplocks key, take a deep breath before you type next time, and try for some complete and readable sentences. We sometimes have trouble spelling, too. That's how we found out a dictionary works wonders.

We doubt very much that Gayle McLaughlin would object to being called an "activist." In fact, we'd be surprised if it's not already on her calling cards. If we're wrong, then Ms. McLaughlin is free to correct us. Until then, we use the word as-is.

We observe the use of "your" quite often, as in "YOUR community," "YOUR city," and "YOUR problems" that makes it sound like you're not from around here. The Great Tazer Conspiracy thinks that YOU are a non-Richmond outsider, and that YOU have some sort of conspiracy going. This sort of behavior has all the earmarks of what resident Tazerville gamehunter Dread Captain would likely call "Sockus Puppetus," or the fabled sockpuppet.

We think you were put up to this or otherwise encouraged to speak on behalf of the Green Party candidate. We're glad that you're interested and we can't stop you from commenting unless you break our common sense rules of conduct, but we can't really take you seriously and would prefer that you butt out since this isn't YOUR community, city, problems, etc. ALLCAPS didn't help either.

If there's any substance in your "message," we'd like to take care of that directly. Yes, we've read Gayle's "10-point plan." It's on her website and we could dissect it if we wanted to. But we don't want to. Residents of Tazerville can look it up or wait for you or one of your fellow volunteer stumpers to come around and wedge a flyer in our door...which has happened already, thank you very much. Richmond voters can make up their minds on those 10 points for themselves.

In fact, we encourage it, just like we would encourage any voter to get smart and be informed about any candidate or issue. This isn't to say we endorse the candidate or plan. In fact, it's quite the opposite since we don't think too much of either one around Tazerville. But learn from her and it just the same. Trust us, you'll thank us come November 7th!

Now, if you don't mind, we've got bigger fish to fry. With butter and lemon.

EDIT 1:12 PM: While we were preparing this post, a response to it came from Tazer friend Mike Ali...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Micheal Ali- The committee said...
Ms. McLaughlin HAS no plan, her 10- point platform does not even reflect the TRUE NEEDS OF RICHMOND. Her platform is taken from then Matt Gonzales; who was the Green member who was a Supervisor on the City and County Board of Supervisors for San Franciscoin 2003.

Her 10-point platform has no substance, no details, no plan of action nothing EXCEPT some photocopy paper that has a vague little outline like kids use in middle school! She couldn't even come up with a original platform for Richmond. She had to use somebdy else's.

The Richmond community sees Ms. McLaughlin as an outsider, she was not born here, did not go to school here. She truly does not have the knowledge or the juice into this community to know what we think or what OUR goals and aspirations are.
Nobody in this Community wants what she says she can 'deliver'.
As for 10-point platform, Gary Bell has one that everybody in this town agrees on.

If you were really a down activist in Gayle's movement, you would not be leaving postings that make it seem like you have issues with people that disagree with your candidates political views.

Pal, it's election time, my one word of advice to you, don't get your nose out of joint. Because if you think it's bad now, the mud-slinging is going to get worse! That is what I have in 20 plus years of community organizing and activism.

Yours in the Struggle for Human and Civil Rights in Richmond,

Mike Ali- The Committee of Families for the Safety of Our Children

1:02 PM


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EDIT August 25, 12:01 AM: Sorry everyone but some of these comments are getting out of hand. We're moving through the bushes with the Banstick even now.

We'd like to remind everyone that they're free to comment but to please be on point and about your business. No idle name calling or acting dumb, thanks.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

About last night...

Sunny, hazy Tuesday greetings to all Tazerville residents! Anyone else catch that candidate's forum at Easter Hill Methodist? Stand back for some Tazer randomness!

* The venue was supposed to be VERY favorable to incumbent Irma Anderson, all the way down to unchallenging and sometimes softball questioning, and yet she still came across as lackluster.

* Maybe she's under the impression that the status quo is peachy keen, but we disagree. There's focus, but then there's TOO focussed. Ditch "Safe Streets Now" and settle for "Do the least to harm Richmond," OK? Thanks, buh-bye.

* By the way, not knowing the answer to a question and referring people to the website schedule for street repairs becomes rather ludicrous when MacDonald Ave. is getting some attention even now...RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE POLICE STATION!

* Is that out of touch? Only the voters know for sure...

* Political sophomore Gayle McLaughlin turned in a nervous effort. Activism can't replace a real managerial position, but them's the breaks for anti-establishementarianism, ain't it?

* By the way, trying to talk race to a predominantly brown crowd might work a little better if you weren't...well, you. Sorry.

* As for "10-point plans," those things look great on paper, but being unable to regurgitate the policies they'd cover on cue makes it seem like you can't even swallow what you're shovelling.

* A quick Tazer question on "social justice": Should that be more about opportunities or outcomes?

* Former council member Gary Bell struck us as downright mayoral: prepared, confident, concise, specific, and unifying. All qualities the Tazer likes to see, though we'll continue to pay close attention and scrutinize.

* Does business acumen necessarily translate into political success? Only one way to find out, we suppose...

* Corky Booze was Corky Booze, God love him. Full of passion and fire, and that's something that the Tazer can't help but admire.

* Jim Rogers was also Jim Rogers, but then we're still not clear if that's an asset or a liability.

* Richard Griffin and Nat Bates: the quintessential voices of wisdom and experience. Definitely assets.

* Jim Jenkins quite frankly fell on his face. Somebody help him up!

* Council member Tony Thurmond appeared genuine and comfortable. Not that he never was before, but he appears to have gained some confidence.

* Newcomer Myrna Lopez -- and we're sorry if we're mangling your name -- pulled down some of the tougher questions and performed remarkably well in our opinion.

In all, it was an interesting night. The Tazer is eager for more!

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Sometimes you wonder...

Get a good eyeful of those opening lines. Ain't it the truth? (Updated: scroll down)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Police focus on community
RICHMOND: Chief's new strategy to solve, prevent crimes is to build relationship with residents


By Karl Fischer
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

With apologies to Irma Anderson, the real mayor of south Richmond holds court every morning in the parking lot of a Wall Avenue liquor store.

He does this while wearing a police badge.

"They're going to ask me where I was, because I was on vacation last week," Officer Anthony Mikell said as he rolled up to Brother's Liquor and Market. "They're used to seeing me out here every day. That's how you get to know people."

Mikell steps out of his patrol car to a hero's welcome. People cross the street to shake his hand, causing a brief bottleneck in front of the store, and Mikell says the warm feelings are mutual. He can name almost everyone he sees, and their mommas, too.

"This guy here makes sure there's no problems," said Tommy Perry, a local. "It's just good to see him out here. The kids really look up to him."

Blue uniforms rarely elicit such approval in flatland neighborhoods. But if a new patrolling strategy brought to Richmond this summer by Police Chief Chris Magnus works as intended, many more neighborhoods will come to know their beat cops as well as Park Plaza knows Mikell.

"This is what we expect from our officers," Magnus said. "When they are not responding to calls for service, we expect them to be engaged with the community, learn about their beats and find ways to improve the quality of life for residents who live in the neighborhoods they serve."

Magnus dramatically reorganized the department in June, reducing the number of patrol beats from 14 to nine while intensifying the focus on regional policing by making members of his command staff directly accountable for keeping the peace in specific sections of the city.

The changes put more officers on patrol most days, enough to cost roughly $37,500 weekly in overtime just to fully staff each shift. The main point was to free time for officers to invest their efforts in solving crime problems on their beats.

Magnus does not promise that his changes will produce quick reductions in violent crime or swifter responses to 911 calls.

But if Richmond sticks with the program, the chief says, residents will notice differences over time.

"These are not quick fixes," said Sgt. Allwyn Brown, who supervises a weekday patrol team. "We're tailoring our efforts for specific neighborhoods and specific communities ... as a form of long-term intervention."

Structural changes

Changes began in April, when Magnus promoted two officers to the rank of deputy chief and assigned them to tasks previously performed by captains: overseeing the department's patrol, investigative and administrative functions.

The captains now help answer one of the department's most frequently asked questions: Whom do you call about a problem?

The answer: It depends on where you live.

Capts. Alec Griffin, Eugene McBride and Anthony Williams each supervise policing in a geographic section of Richmond: the northern, central and southern districts.

With support from the central bureaucracy, captains and their lieutenants now coordinate neighborhood projects, keep an eye out for block-level crime trends within their districts, work with local leaders and represent the department at community functions.

"We're trying to improve continuity on our patrol beats. What that means is we are trying to keep the same officers working in the same areas for as long as we can," Magnus said. "If a resident calls the police department for nonemergency service, they can expect to see one of their usual officers most of the time."

One officer must work each beat at all times. Given the department's drastic staffing shortage, that requirement could cause labor problems if the department does not soon fill vacancies.

The department now pays about 600 hours of overtime each week to maintain its minimum patrol staffing numbers.

"I think we're starting to reach our saturation point for working mandatory overtime hours," said Detective Kevin Martin, president of the Richmond Police Officers Association. "Fewer officers are signing up" voluntarily.

Sgt. Lori Curran, the recruiting officer, said the department intends to fill its 23 vacancies by next summer.

"Ultimately, we want to have more than one officer for each beat on each shift," Magnus said. "But right now, we're struggling to staff one officer per beat."

They wear two hats

Most police departments use geographic beats mainly to divide the labor on a patrol shift. The principal gauge of service is how quickly and consistently officers arrive to service calls.

Richmond police maintain that standard when it comes to life-threatening emergencies, crimes in progress and other "hot" calls, Magnus said.

But even though more officers now work patrol beats than before the reorganization, the chief says residents should not necessarily expect faster service for nonemergency calls. In fact, lower-priority calls, such as complaints about loud music or requests for an officer to document vandalism, may wait longer.

That's because the department now expects patrol officers to use their own initiative more to investigate and prevent crime on their beats. When not responding to emergency calls, officers now take more time to talk to residents and work on projects to address public-safety issues they find on their beats.

"A lot of our activity was generated by calls for service. Our goal was pretty much to keep the board clean" of holding calls for service, said Officer Nathan Lonso, who patrols in the Iron Triangle neighborhood. "Now instead of reacting so much, I'm doing more preventative police work."

Officers' shifts overlap much of the day, allowing more time for them to work on beat projects and meet the neighbors. Beat officers are expected to collaborate on those efforts.

"Instead of one officer, a whole team is assigned to a patrol beat," Magnus said. "They may work different shifts, but they are expected to communicate with each other about issues affecting their beat and work collaboratively with the community to solve problems."

Does it work?

Richmond's most-watched number, the annual homicide total, stood at 24 as of Friday. At this time last year, considered the worst in a decade for street violence, it was 19.

But many civic leaders say they see improved service from police.

"Once people get to know a beat officer and develop some kind of stability ... and trust, I bet they could solve a lot more crimes," said A.J. Jelani, president of the Belding Woods neighborhood council.

Of the 40 homicides reported last year in Richmond, detectives collected enough evidence to bring charges against a suspect in only five cases. But this year, about half of the city's cases have resulted in charges or arrests, or they soon will, detectives said.

The greater freedom given to patrol officers to socialize on their beats has helped several investigations, Mikell said.

Back at the liquor store on a warm July morning, he points in the direction of a horrific crime scene from the day before: A gunman blew off a street mechanic's knee cap for failing to fix his car.

Before the detectives even arrived at the scene, Mikell's cell phone lit up. Before the crime tape fell, he knew in lengthy detail who did what, what was said and why.

"It affects you subconsciously. You think to yourself, 'My neighborhood is not safe anymore,'" Mikell said. "I think I'm successful because I can relate to people out here. I wouldn't want to feel that way about my neighborhood, and I don't want them to feel that way either."

Reach Karl Fischer at 510-262-2728 or kfischer@cctimes.com.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's hear it for Chief Magnus and RPD! He's man enough to tell us straight up that there's no quick fix...like calling his plan "Safe Streets Now"...

EDIT 7:46 PM: Some sad news to report, which dovetails and updates some info in the above article. Hat tip to Tazer friend Michael Ali.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Police seek third suspect in Richmond man's killing

By Shirley Dang
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

A Richmond man died Saturday night after being shot, according to police.

Richmond police officers found Lorenzo Melendez, 26, on the 400 block of 22nd Street near Nevin Avenue around 10:30 p.m., Lt. Enos Johnson said Sunday. He apparently was hit in the upper torso across the street from his house and staggered close to his home, where he collapsed, Johnson said.

Patrol cars nearby heard the gunfire and drove to the scene. Officers detained two men, including one juvenile, fleeing the neighborhood, Johnson said. Police are seeking a third male in connection with the shooting, he said.

Melendez was taken to Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Richmond shortly after police found his body. Doctors could not revive him.

His death was the city's 25th homicide of the year.

Officers are still investigating the killing. Anyone with information should call Detective Eric Smith at 510-307-8106. The Richmond Police Department's anonymous tip line is 510-232-TIPS